EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 vs ASTM A240/A240M S20103
Strong Match — 86.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 (EN 10088-1:2014) and ASTM A240/A240M S20103 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A240/A240M S20103 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 vs ASTM A240/A240M S20103 is a 86.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a strong match overall at 86.9%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5
ASTM A240/A240M S20103
Tensile Strength
Not specified
>=655 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=260 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=40%
Hardness
Not specified
<=217 HB
Condition
Not specified
Plate, sheet and strip; yield by 0.2 percent offset
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5
Not documented
ASTM A240/A240M S20103
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A240/A240M S20103.
Can EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 Be Substituted With ASTM A240/A240M S20103?
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 and ASTM A240/A240M S20103 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that ASTM A240/A240M S20103 is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 and ASTM A240/A240M S20103?
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A240/A240M S20103.
Can EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 be substituted with ASTM A240/A240M S20103?
EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 and ASTM A240/A240M S20103 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that ASTM A240/A240M S20103 is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-1 X2CrMnNiN17-7-5 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.