Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 (EN 10088-1:2014) and ASTM A240/A240M S43940 (ASTM A240/A240M:2025) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A240/A240M S43940 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 vs ASTM A240/A240M S43940 is a 86.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12
ASTM A240/A240M S43940
Tensile Strength
Not specified
>=430 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=250 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=18%
Hardness
Not specified
<=180 HB
Condition
Not specified
Plate, sheet and strip; yield by 0.2 percent offset
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12
Not documented
ASTM A240/A240M S43940
Pressure vessels and general applications (plate, sheet and strip)
Key Differences
ASTM A240/A240M S43940 specifies Ti which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12.
Can EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 Be Substituted With ASTM A240/A240M S43940?
EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 and ASTM A240/A240M S43940 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 and ASTM A240/A240M S43940?
ASTM A240/A240M S43940 specifies Ti which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12.
Can EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 be substituted with ASTM A240/A240M S43940?
EN 10088-1 X2CrTi12 and ASTM A240/A240M S43940 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.