EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10
Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 (EN 10088-1:2014) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 is defined under European Standard (EN) (Europe).
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 60.7% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
Not specified
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
≥205 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
≥40%
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2
Not documented
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 specifies Mo, N, Cu which are not specified for GOST 5632 08X18H10.
Can EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 specifies Mo, N, Cu which are not specified for GOST 5632 08X18H10.
Can EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiCuMo17-11-3-2 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.