EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42
Related Material — 68.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 (EN 10088-1:2014) and BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42 is a 68.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 68.3%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2
BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42
Condition
Not specified
Softened, 1000-1100 deg C
Tensile Strength
Not specified
510 MPa min
Yield Strength
Not specified
190 MPa min (0.2% proof)
Elongation
Not specified
40 % min
Hardness
Not specified
183 HB max
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2
Not documented
BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42
Austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel (section five)
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42.
Can EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42?
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 and BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 and BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42?
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42.
Can EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42?
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMnCuN18-12-4-2 and BS 970 (Part 1) 303S42 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.