Minimal Match — 24.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 (EN 10088-1:2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4401 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 1.4401 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 vs EN 10088-1 1.4401 is a 24.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 24.3%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6
EN 10088-1 1.4401
Tensile Strength
Not specified
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
≥210 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
≥40%
Hardness
Not specified
≤215 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6
Not documented
EN 10088-1 1.4401
Marine, chemical processing, pharmaceutical equipment
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 specifies P, S, N, Nb which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4401.
Can EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4401?
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 and EN 10088-1 1.4401 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 and EN 10088-1 1.4401?
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 specifies P, S, N, Nb which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4401.
Can EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4401?
EN 10088-1 X8CrCoNiMo10-6 and EN 10088-1 1.4401 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.