Strong Match — 90.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 (EN 10088-1:2023) and EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 (EN 10088-3:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 vs EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 is a 90.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a strong match overall at 90.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21
Tensile Strength
Not specified
420-640 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
>=240 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=20%
Hardness
Not specified
<=200 HB
Condition
Not specified
Annealed (+A), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 50 mm; Yield Strength is Rp0.2, Elongation is A (longitudinal), hardness for guidance only
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20
Not documented
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
Key Differences
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20.
Can EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 Be Substituted With EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21?
EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 and EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 and EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20.
Can EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 be substituted with EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21?
EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 and EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-1 X2CrNbTi20 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.