EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 vs EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3
Close Alternative — 81.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 (EN 10088-1:2023) and EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 vs EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3 is a 81.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 81.2%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3.
Can EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3?
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 and EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 and EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3?
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3.
Can EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3?
EN 10088-1 X3CrNiMo18-12-3 and EN 10088-1 X2CrNiMo17-12-3 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.