EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 vs IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1
Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 (EN 10088-1:2023) and IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1 (IS 11169 (Part 2):2023) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 vs IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1 is a 75.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X3CrS12
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1
Reduction of Area, soft annealed (+A)
Not specified
>=60% (over 5 to 25 mm)
Tensile Strength, soft annealed (+A)
Not specified
<=600 MPa (over 5 to 25 mm)
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X3CrS12
Not documented
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1
Cold heading and cold extrusion of stainless steel parts; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 0.8 to 25 mm (clause 1.1, Table 13)
Can EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 Be Substituted With IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1?
EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 and IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 and IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 be substituted with IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1?
EN 10088-1 X3CrS12 and IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr17Mo1 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.