Close Alternative — 84.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 (EN 10088-1:2023) and EN 10088-3 X46Cr13 (EN 10088-3:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-3 X46Cr13 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 vs EN 10088-3 X46Cr13 is a 90.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 84.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-1 X65Cr13
EN 10088-3 X46Cr13
Tensile Strength
Not specified
<=800 MPa
Hardness
Not specified
<=245 HB
Condition
Not specified
Annealed (+A), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, size range not stated; hardness for guidance only
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X65Cr13
Not documented
EN 10088-3 X46Cr13
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
Can EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 Be Substituted With EN 10088-3 X46Cr13?
EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 and EN 10088-3 X46Cr13 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 and EN 10088-3 X46Cr13?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 be substituted with EN 10088-3 X46Cr13?
EN 10088-1 X65Cr13 and EN 10088-3 X46Cr13 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.