Close Alternative — 84.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 (EN 10088-1:2023) and ASTM A959 316Ti (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A959 316Ti is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 vs ASTM A959 316Ti is a 84.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 84.1%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2
Not documented
ASTM A959 316Ti
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Can EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 316Ti?
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 and ASTM A959 316Ti are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 and ASTM A959 316Ti?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 be substituted with ASTM A959 316Ti?
EN 10088-1 X6CrNiMo17-13-2 and ASTM A959 316Ti are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.