Minimal Match — 34.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 (EN 10088-2:2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4006 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 is typically used for general purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is commonly used for cutlery, turbine blades, fasteners, surgical instruments.
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 vs EN 10088-1 1.4006 is a 52% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 34.6%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3
EN 10088-1 1.4006
Tensile Strength
750-950 MPa
≥540 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
>=550 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=15%
≥18%
Hardness
<=300 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (+A), hot rolled strip, up to 13.5 mm thick
Not specified
Hardness HRC
Not specified
36–45 (hardened)
Typical Applications
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3
General purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 specifies P, S, Mo, Cu which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4006?
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 and EN 10088-1 1.4006?
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 specifies P, S, Mo, Cu which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4006?
EN 10088-2 X1CrNiMoCu12-7-3 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.