Related Material — 69.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 (EN 10088-2:2014) and ASTM A959 329 (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 is typically used for general purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip, while ASTM A959 329 is commonly used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1).
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A959 329 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 vs ASTM A959 329 is a 69.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.3%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4
ASTM A959 329
Tensile Strength
<=1275 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=5%
Not specified
Condition
Solution annealed (+AT, delivery condition), cold rolled strip, up to 8 mm thick
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4
General purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip
ASTM A959 329
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 specifies Cu, Nb which are not specified for ASTM A959 329.
Can EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 329?
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 and ASTM A959 329 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 and ASTM A959 329?
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 specifies Cu, Nb which are not specified for ASTM A959 329.
Can EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 be substituted with ASTM A959 329?
EN 10088-2 X5CrNiCuNb16-4 and ASTM A959 329 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.