Strong Match — 93.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 (EN 10088-2:2014) and ASTM A959 430FSe (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 is typically used for general purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip, while ASTM A959 430FSe is commonly used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1).
EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A959 430FSe is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 vs ASTM A959 430FSe is a 93.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a strong match overall at 93.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-2 X6Cr17
ASTM A959 430FSe
Tensile Strength
430-600 MPa
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (+A), cold rolled strip, up to 8 mm thick; Elongation is A80 (under 3 mm) or A (3 mm and over), longitudinal and transverse
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=260 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=20%
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-2 X6Cr17
General purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip
ASTM A959 430FSe
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
ASTM A959 430FSe specifies Se which is not specified for EN 10088-2 X6Cr17.
Can EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 Be Substituted With ASTM A959 430FSe?
EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 and ASTM A959 430FSe overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that ASTM A959 430FSe is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.
What is the difference between EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 and ASTM A959 430FSe?
ASTM A959 430FSe specifies Se which is not specified for EN 10088-2 X6Cr17.
Can EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 be substituted with ASTM A959 430FSe?
EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 and ASTM A959 430FSe overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that ASTM A959 430FSe is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-2 X6Cr17 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.