EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 vs EN 10088-1 1.4301
Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 (EN 10088-2:2014) and EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 is typically used for general purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is commonly used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware.
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 vs EN 10088-1 1.4301 is a 53.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Tensile Strength
650-850 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=380 MPa
≥210 MPa
Elongation
>=30%
≥45%
Condition
Solution annealed (+AT), cold rolled strip, up to 8 mm thick; Yield Strength is Rp0.2 (transverse), Elongation is A80 for under 3 mm thick
Not specified
Hardness
Not specified
≤215 HB
Typical Applications
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2
General purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
Key Differences
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 specifies Mo, N, Cu which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4301?
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 and EN 10088-1 1.4301?
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 specifies Mo, N, Cu which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4301?
EN 10088-2 X6CrMnNiCuN18-12-4-2 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.