EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 vs EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5
Close Alternative — 78.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 (EN 10088-2:2014) and EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 vs EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5 is a 78.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 78.4%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2
EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5
Tensile Strength
540-850 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=230 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=45%
Not specified
Condition
Solution annealed (+AT), cold rolled strip, up to 8 mm thick; Yield Strength is Rp0.2 (transverse), Elongation is A80 for under 3 mm thick
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2
General purposes, hot or cold rolled sheet/plate and strip
EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5.
Can EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5?
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 and EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 and EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5?
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5.
Can EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5?
EN 10088-2 X9CrMnNiCu17-8-5-2 and EN 10088-1 X12CrMnNiN18-9-5 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.