EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 vs EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1
Close Alternative — 79.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 (EN 10088-3:2014) and EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1 (EN 10088-1:2023) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 vs EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1 is a 79.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 79.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21
EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1
Tensile Strength
420-640 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=240 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=20%
Not specified
Hardness
<=200 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (+A), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 50 mm; Yield Strength is Rp0.2, Elongation is A (longitudinal), hardness for guidance only
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1 specifies Ti, V which are not specified for EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21.
Can EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 and EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 and EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1?
EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1 specifies Ti, V which are not specified for EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21.
Can EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNbCu21 and EN 10088-1 X2CrCuNbTiV22-1 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.