EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 vs EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2
Strong Match — 96.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 (EN 10088-3:2014) and EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 (EN 10088-3:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 is typically used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products, while EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 is commonly used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products.
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 vs EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 is a 94.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 100%.
Combined, this makes them a strong match overall at 96.3%.
Frequently Compared With EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2
Tensile Strength
500-700 MPa
500-700 MPa
Yield Strength
>=200 MPa
>=200 MPa
Elongation
>=40%
>=40%
Hardness
<=215 HB
<=215 HB
Condition
Solution annealed (+AT), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 160 mm; Yield Strength is Rp0.2, Elongation is A (longitudinal), hardness for guidance only
Solution annealed (+AT), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 160 mm; Yield Strength is Rp0.2, Elongation is A (longitudinal), hardness for guidance only
Typical Applications
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
Key Differences
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2.
Can EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 Be Substituted With EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 and EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.
What is the difference between EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 and EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 specifies Cu which is not specified for EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2.
Can EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 be substituted with EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2?
EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 and EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 overlap closely enough on chemistry and mechanical properties that EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMoCuS17-10-2 is often considered as a substitute for EN 10088-3 X2CrNiMo17-12-2 in many applications. Always confirm the specific property range your application needs before substituting, and check with your supplier's mill certificate.