Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 (EN 10088-3:2014) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 is typically used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products, while GOST 5632 08X18H10 is commonly used for chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications.
EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 is defined under European Standard (EN) (Europe).
As per chemical composition, EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 70.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10088-3 X6Cr17
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
400-630 MPa
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
>=240 MPa
≥205 MPa
Elongation
>=20%
≥40%
Hardness
<=200 HB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed (+A), conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 100 mm; Yield Strength is Rp0.2, Elongation is A (longitudinal), hardness for guidance only
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10088-3 X6Cr17
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, rods, wire, sections and bright products
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Key Differences
GOST 5632 08X18H10 specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10088-3 X6Cr17.
Can EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
GOST 5632 08X18H10 specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10088-3 X6Cr17.
Can EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
EN 10088-3 X6Cr17 and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.