EN ISO 4957 1.2316 vs IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2

Related Material — 65% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

EN ISO 4957 1.2316 (EN ISO 4957:2018) and IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 (IS 11169 (Part 2):1989) are both steel grades. EN ISO 4957 1.2316 is classified under Tool & Die Steels, while IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 is classified under Stainless Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below. EN ISO 4957 1.2316 is typically used for plastic injection moulds for corrosive materials, food packaging moulds, while IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 is commonly used for cold heading and cold extrusion; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars (clause 1.1). EN ISO 4957 1.2316 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.

As per chemical composition, EN ISO 4957 1.2316 vs IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 is a 66.4% match. Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored. Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.

Frequently Compared With EN ISO 4957 1.2316:
EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 AISI 52100 GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV GOST 5950 4H5MFS IS 1570 (Part 6) 133T3 IS 1570 (Part 6) 55T8 IS 1570 (Part 6) 75T6 GOST 5950 4H5MFS1 IS 1570 (Part 6) 103T3 IS 1570 (Part 6) 50T8 IS 1570 (Part 6) 65T6 IS 1570 (Part 6) 70T3
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
66.4%
MECHANICAL MATCH
No shared data
OVERALL
65%
Specifications
Property EN ISO 4957 1.2316 IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2
Standard EN ISO 4957:2018 IS 11169 (Part 2):1989
Category Tool & Die Steels Stainless Steel
C (%) ≤0.06 <=0.030
Si (%) ≤0.50 <=1.0
Mn (%) ≤1.00 <=2.0
Cr (%) 15.5–17.5 16.0-18.0
Mo (%) 0.80–1.30 2.0-3.0
Ni (%) 0.80–1.50 10.0-14.0
S (%) Not specified <=0.030
P (%) Not specified <=0.045
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property EN ISO 4957 1.2316 IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2
Hardness HRC 28–34 (pre-hardened) Not specified
Hardness HRC (hardened) 38–44 Not specified
Corrosion Resistance Good in humid/corrosive environments Not specified
Yield Strength (0.2% proof) Not specified >=225 MPa
Tensile Strength Not specified 500-750 MPa
Elongation Not specified >=40%
Impact (U-notch 5 mm) Not specified >=60 J
Condition Not specified Quenched reference test piece (Table 6 treatment)
Typical Applications
EN ISO 4957 1.2316
Plastic injection moulds for corrosive materials, food packaging moulds
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2
Cold heading and cold extrusion; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
Can EN ISO 4957 1.2316 Be Substituted With IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2?
EN ISO 4957 1.2316 and IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
Forms & Sizes Available on M-EX
EN ISO 4957 1.2316
Round Bar → (2 listings)
Diameter: 80–80 mm (3.15–3.15 in)
Length: 2600–2700 mm (102.36–106.3 in)
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2
No active listings currently.
On M-EX Right Now
EN ISO 4957 1.2316
2 active listings and RFQs →
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2
0 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between EN ISO 4957 1.2316 and IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2?
Different category: EN ISO 4957 1.2316 is Tool & Die Steels, IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 is Stainless Steel. IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN ISO 4957 1.2316.
Can EN ISO 4957 1.2316 be substituted with IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2?
EN ISO 4957 1.2316 and IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni12Mo2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.