Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 (EN ISO 683-17:2014) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 62.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
700-850 MPa
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
500 MPa min
225 MPa min
Elongation
14% min
>=19%
Hardness
207-248 HB
Not specified
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Condition
Not specified
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Typical Applications
EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4
Used in gears, shafts, axles, high-tensile bolts, and structural components.
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies Ni which is not specified for EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4.
Can EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies Ni which is not specified for EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4.
Can EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
EN ISO 683-17 20CrMo4 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.