Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA (GB/T 1222-2016) and IS 4367 55Si7 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 4367 55Si7 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 1222 55CrMnA vs IS 4367 55Si7 is a 78.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA
IS 4367 55Si7
Tensile Strength
≥1225 MPa
1300-1500 MPa
Yield Strength
≥1080 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
≥6%
Not specified
Hardness
Not specified
380-440 HB
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=245 HB
Condition
Not specified
Hardened and tempered, ruling section up to 100 mm
Typical Applications
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA
Automotive leaf springs, coil springs
IS 4367 55Si7
Not documented
Key Differences
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA specifies Cr which is not specified for IS 4367 55Si7.
IS 4367 55Si7 specifies S, P which are not specified for GB/T 1222 55CrMnA.
Can GB/T 1222 55CrMnA Be Substituted With IS 4367 55Si7?
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA and IS 4367 55Si7 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 1222 55CrMnA and IS 4367 55Si7?
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA specifies Cr which is not specified for IS 4367 55Si7. IS 4367 55Si7 specifies S, P which are not specified for GB/T 1222 55CrMnA.
Can GB/T 1222 55CrMnA be substituted with IS 4367 55Si7?
GB/T 1222 55CrMnA and IS 4367 55Si7 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.