Related Material — 60.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V (GB/T 1299-2014) and GOST 5950 3H2W8F (GOST 5950-2000) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is typically used for used for hot forging dies, extrusion dies, die-casting molds, hot punches, and hot shear blades., while GOST 5950 3H2W8F is commonly used for used for forging dies, extrusion tools, hot punches, mandrels, and die inserts..
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T) (China).
As per chemical composition, GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V vs GOST 5950 3H2W8F is a 87.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 5.6%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 60.5%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V
GOST 5950 3H2W8F
Tensile Strength
1180-1380 MPa
1400-1700 MPa
Yield Strength
980-1180 MPa
1200 MPa min
Elongation
10-14%
8% min
Hardness
48-54 HRC
45-50 HRC
Typical Applications
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V
Used for hot forging dies, extrusion dies, die-casting molds, hot punches, and hot shear blades.
GOST 5950 3H2W8F
Used for forging dies, extrusion tools, hot punches, mandrels, and die inserts.
Key Differences
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V specifies Mn, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 3H2W8F.
Can GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V Be Substituted With GOST 5950 3H2W8F?
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V and GOST 5950 3H2W8F share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V and GOST 5950 3H2W8F?
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V specifies Mn, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 3H2W8F.
Can GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V be substituted with GOST 5950 3H2W8F?
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V and GOST 5950 3H2W8F share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.