Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A (GB/T 3077-2015) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is a 70.7% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Tensile Strength
980-1180 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
785-980 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
10-14%
Not specified
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
Not specified
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A
Used for gears, shafts, pinions, aircraft parts, heavy-duty bearings, and transmission components.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Not documented
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A specifies Ni, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A specifies Ni, P, S which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5.
Can GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.