Minimal Match — 36.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo (GB/T 3077:2015) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 54.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 36.4%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
>=980 MPa
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
>=785 MPa
225 MPa min
Elongation
>=9%
>=19%
Hardness
<=197 HB
Not specified
Condition
Quenched and tempered, test sample 15 mm; hardness is for bars delivered annealed or high temperature tempered
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo
Used for carburized gears, shafts, heavy-duty pinions, gearbox components, couplings, and bearings.
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo specifies Cu which is not specified for IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6.
Can GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo specifies Cu which is not specified for IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6.
Can GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
GB/T 3077 20CrNiMo and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.