Related Material — 67.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 700 Q235A (GB/T 700:2006) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GB/T 700 Q235A is typically used for structural sections, welded structures, general fabrication, machinery frames, steel plates, pipes, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing.
GB/T 700 Q235A is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 700 Q235A vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 96.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 8.7%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 67.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 700 Q235A
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Tensile Strength
370-500 MPa
440-600 MPa
Yield Strength
>=235 MPa
300 MPa min
Elongation
>=26%
22% min
Condition
Hot rolled, controlled rolled or normalized; yield up to 16 mm, elongation up to 40 mm (N/mm2 = MPa)
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Can GB/T 700 Q235A Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
GB/T 700 Q235A and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 700 Q235A and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can GB/T 700 Q235A be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
GB/T 700 Q235A and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.