Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 1050 20 (GOST 1050-2013) and BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 (BS 970 (Part 1):1983) are both steel grades.
GOST 1050 20 is classified under Carbon Steel, while BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 is classified under Alloy Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
GOST 1050 20 is typically used for shafts, bolts, gears, pins, forgings, machined components, while BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 is commonly used for case hardening steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (table 11 mechanical properties)..
BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 is defined under British Standards (BS) (United Kingdom).
As per chemical composition, GOST 1050 20 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 is a 65.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Case hardening steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (Table 11 mechanical properties).
Key Differences
Different category: GOST 1050 20 is Carbon Steel, BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 is Alloy Steel.
GOST 1050 20 specifies Si, Cu which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13.
Can GOST 1050 20 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13?
GOST 1050 20 and BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 1050 20 and BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13?
Different category: GOST 1050 20 is Carbon Steel, BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 is Alloy Steel. GOST 1050 20 specifies Si, Cu which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13.
Can GOST 1050 20 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13?
GOST 1050 20 and BS 970 (Part 1) 655M13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.