Minimal Match — 53.8% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 1050 40 (GOST 1050-2013) and BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
GOST 1050 40 is typically used for used for shafts, gears, axles, bolts, and machine structural parts., while BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15 is commonly used for as-rolled, or as-rolled and softened, steel (section two).
BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15 is defined under British Standards (BS) (United Kingdom).
As per chemical composition, GOST 1050 40 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15 is a 80.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 53.8%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 1050 40
BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15
Tensile Strength
570-740 MPa
310 MPa min
Yield Strength
340 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
19% min
25 % min
Hardness
170-220 HB
121 HB min
Condition
Not specified
As-rolled
Typical Applications
GOST 1050 40
Used for shafts, gears, axles, bolts, and machine structural parts.
BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15
As-rolled, or as-rolled and softened, steel (section two)
Key Differences
GOST 1050 40 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15.
Can GOST 1050 40 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15?
GOST 1050 40 and BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 1050 40 and BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15?
GOST 1050 40 specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15.
Can GOST 1050 40 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15?
GOST 1050 40 and BS 970 (Part 1) 055M15 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.