Related Material — 65.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 380 St3sp (GOST 380-2005) and GB/T 1591 Q355C (GB/T 1591:2018) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GOST 380 St3sp is typically used for structural components, welded structures, plates, construction equipment, machinery frames, rolled sections, while GB/T 1591 Q355C is commonly used for general structure for engineering (plates, strips, bars and sections).
GB/T 1591 Q355C is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T) (China).
As per chemical composition, GOST 380 St3sp vs GB/T 1591 Q355C is a 80% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 35.9%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 380 St3sp
GB/T 1591 Q355C
Tensile Strength
370-490 MPa
470-630 MPa
Yield Strength
>=245 MPa
>=355 MPa
Elongation
>=22%
>=22%
Hardness
<=170 HB
Not specified
Condition
Not specified
Hot-rolled (as-rolled), nominal thickness or diameter up to 16 mm for yield; tensile strength for up to 100 mm; elongation longitudinal, up to 40 mm
General structure for engineering (plates, strips, bars and sections)
Key Differences
GB/T 1591 Q355C specifies N which is not specified for GOST 380 St3sp.
Can GOST 380 St3sp Be Substituted With GB/T 1591 Q355C?
GOST 380 St3sp and GB/T 1591 Q355C share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 380 St3sp and GB/T 1591 Q355C?
GB/T 1591 Q355C specifies N which is not specified for GOST 380 St3sp.
Can GOST 380 St3sp be substituted with GB/T 1591 Q355C?
GOST 380 St3sp and GB/T 1591 Q355C share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.