Related Material — 65% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 380 St3sp (GOST 380-2005) and SAE J404 50B46 (SAE J404:2009) are both steel grades.
GOST 380 St3sp is classified under Structural Steel, while SAE J404 50B46 is classified under Alloy Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below.
GOST 380 St3sp is typically used for structural components, welded structures, plates, construction equipment, machinery frames, rolled sections, while SAE J404 50B46 is commonly used for chemistry-only alloy steel grade; see the composition notes for product scope.
SAE J404 50B46 is defined under SAE International (United States).
As per chemical composition, GOST 380 St3sp vs SAE J404 50B46 is a 68.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Chemistry-only alloy steel grade; see the composition notes for product scope
Key Differences
Different category: GOST 380 St3sp is Structural Steel, SAE J404 50B46 is Alloy Steel.
GOST 380 St3sp specifies Cu which is not specified for SAE J404 50B46.
Can GOST 380 St3sp Be Substituted With SAE J404 50B46?
GOST 380 St3sp and SAE J404 50B46 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 380 St3sp and SAE J404 50B46?
Different category: GOST 380 St3sp is Structural Steel, SAE J404 50B46 is Alloy Steel. GOST 380 St3sp specifies Cu which is not specified for SAE J404 50B46.
Can GOST 380 St3sp be substituted with SAE J404 50B46?
GOST 380 St3sp and SAE J404 50B46 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.