Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) and BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GOST 4543 12HN3A is typically used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components., while BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15 is commonly used for case hardening steel (section four).
BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15 is defined under British Standards (BS) (United Kingdom).
As per chemical composition, GOST 4543 12HN3A vs BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15 is a 70.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 4543 12HN3A
BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15
Tensile Strength
850-1050 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
685 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
11% min
Not specified
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
Not specified
Typical Applications
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
GOST 4543 12HN3A specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15.
Can GOST 4543 12HN3A Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15?
GOST 4543 12HN3A and BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 4543 12HN3A and BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15?
GOST 4543 12HN3A specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15.
Can GOST 4543 12HN3A be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15?
GOST 4543 12HN3A and BS 970 (Part 1) 635H15 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.