Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) and GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 (GB/T 3077-2015) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GOST 4543 12HN3A is typically used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components., while GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is commonly used for used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings..
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T) (China).
As per chemical composition, GOST 4543 12HN3A vs GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is a 84.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 43.5%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 4543 12HN3A
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
Tensile Strength
850-1050 MPa
880-1080 MPa
Yield Strength
685 MPa min
685-880 MPa
Elongation
11% min
10-14%
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
Used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings.
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can GOST 4543 12HN3A Be Substituted With GB/T 3077 15CrNi6?
GOST 4543 12HN3A and GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 4543 12HN3A and GB/T 3077 15CrNi6?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can GOST 4543 12HN3A be substituted with GB/T 3077 15CrNi6?
GOST 4543 12HN3A and GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.