Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 4543 20HNM (GOST 4543-2016) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GOST 4543 20HNM is typically used for used for gears, splined shafts, bushings, axles, and machine drive components., while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI) (Italy).
As per chemical composition, GOST 4543 20HNM vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 51.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 15%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 4543 20HNM
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
850-1000 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
685 MPa min
400-600 MPa
Elongation
12% min
10-14 %
Hardness
56-60 HRC (case)
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
GOST 4543 20HNM
Used for gears, splined shafts, bushings, axles, and machine drive components.
GOST 4543 20HNM specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies Si, P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 20HNM.
Can GOST 4543 20HNM Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GOST 4543 20HNM and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 4543 20HNM and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GOST 4543 20HNM specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6. UNI 11234 100Cr6 specifies Si, P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 20HNM.
Can GOST 4543 20HNM be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GOST 4543 20HNM and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.