Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 4543 40X (GOST 4543-2016) and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 (EN 10028-2:2017) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GOST 4543 40X is typically used for gears, shafts, axles, spindles, studs, automotive components, while EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is commonly used for flat products for pressure purposes.
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is defined under European Standard (EN) (Europe).
As per chemical composition, GOST 4543 40X vs EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 is a 56.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 4543 40X
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10
Tensile Strength
980-1180 MPa
480-630 MPa
Yield Strength
>=785 MPa
>=310 MPa
Elongation
>=10%
>=18%
Hardness
229-285 HB
Not specified
Condition
Not specified
Usual delivery condition normalized and tempered (+NT), nominal thickness up to 16 mm; transverse direction, Yield Strength is ReH, Elongation is A
GOST 4543 40X specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10.
EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies N, Mo which are not specified for GOST 4543 40X.
Can GOST 4543 40X Be Substituted With EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
GOST 4543 40X and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 4543 40X and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
GOST 4543 40X specifies Ni which is not specified for EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10. EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 specifies N, Mo which are not specified for GOST 4543 40X.
Can GOST 4543 40X be substituted with EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10?
GOST 4543 40X and EN 10028-2 10CrMo9-10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.