Related Material — 60.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 5950 3H2W8F (GOST 5950-2000) and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V (GB/T 1299-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GOST 5950 3H2W8F is typically used for used for forging dies, extrusion tools, hot punches, mandrels, and die inserts., while GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is commonly used for used for hot forging dies, extrusion dies, die-casting molds, hot punches, and hot shear blades..
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T) (China).
As per chemical composition, GOST 5950 3H2W8F vs GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is a 87.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 5.6%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 60.5%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 5950 3H2W8F
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V
Tensile Strength
1400-1700 MPa
1180-1380 MPa
Yield Strength
1200 MPa min
980-1180 MPa
Elongation
8% min
10-14%
Hardness
45-50 HRC
48-54 HRC
Typical Applications
GOST 5950 3H2W8F
Used for forging dies, extrusion tools, hot punches, mandrels, and die inserts.
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V
Used for hot forging dies, extrusion dies, die-casting molds, hot punches, and hot shear blades.
Key Differences
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V specifies Mn, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 3H2W8F.
Can GOST 5950 3H2W8F Be Substituted With GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V?
GOST 5950 3H2W8F and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 5950 3H2W8F and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V?
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V specifies Mn, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 3H2W8F.
Can GOST 5950 3H2W8F be substituted with GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V?
GOST 5950 3H2W8F and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.