Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 5950 H12 (GOST 5950-2000) and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V (GB/T 1299-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GOST 5950 H12 is typically used for used for cold dies, punches, shear blades, rolls, and forming tools., while GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is commonly used for used for hot forging dies, extrusion dies, die-casting molds, hot punches, and hot shear blades..
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T) (China).
As per chemical composition, GOST 5950 H12 vs GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V is a 64.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 1.3%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 5950 H12
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V
Tensile Strength
1000-1200 MPa
1180-1380 MPa
Yield Strength
800 MPa min
980-1180 MPa
Elongation
5% min
10-14%
Hardness
60-64 HRC
48-54 HRC
Typical Applications
GOST 5950 H12
Used for cold dies, punches, shear blades, rolls, and forming tools.
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V
Used for hot forging dies, extrusion dies, die-casting molds, hot punches, and hot shear blades.
Key Differences
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V specifies W, V, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 H12.
Can GOST 5950 H12 Be Substituted With GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V?
GOST 5950 H12 and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 5950 H12 and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V?
GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V specifies W, V, P, S which are not specified for GOST 5950 H12.
Can GOST 5950 H12 be substituted with GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V?
GOST 5950 H12 and GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.