Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 5950 H12F1 (GOST 5950-2000) and GOST 5950 4H5MFS (GOST 5950-2000) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GOST 5950 H12F1 is typically used for used for blanking dies, punches, forming dies, cutters, and rolling tools., while GOST 5950 4H5MFS is commonly used for used for die casting dies, forging tools, extrusion dies, punches, and hot shear blades..
As per chemical composition, GOST 5950 H12F1 vs GOST 5950 4H5MFS is a 59.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 5950 H12F1
GOST 5950 4H5MFS
Tensile Strength
1050-1250 MPa
1350-1650 MPa
Yield Strength
850 MPa min
1150 MPa min
Elongation
5% min
9% min
Hardness
61-65 HRC
44-50 HRC
Typical Applications
GOST 5950 H12F1
Used for blanking dies, punches, forming dies, cutters, and rolling tools.
GOST 5950 4H5MFS
Used for die casting dies, forging tools, extrusion dies, punches, and hot shear blades.
Key Differences
GOST 5950 H12F1 specifies Mn which is not specified for GOST 5950 4H5MFS.
GOST 5950 4H5MFS specifies Mo which is not specified for GOST 5950 H12F1.
Can GOST 5950 H12F1 Be Substituted With GOST 5950 4H5MFS?
GOST 5950 H12F1 and GOST 5950 4H5MFS share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 5950 H12F1 and GOST 5950 4H5MFS?
GOST 5950 H12F1 specifies Mn which is not specified for GOST 5950 4H5MFS. GOST 5950 4H5MFS specifies Mo which is not specified for GOST 5950 H12F1.
Can GOST 5950 H12F1 be substituted with GOST 5950 4H5MFS?
GOST 5950 H12F1 and GOST 5950 4H5MFS share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.