IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 (IS 11169 (Part 1):1984) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 is a 80% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Core Tensile Strength
>=600 MPa (30 mm)
Not specified
Core Elongation
>=13% (30 mm)
Not specified
Hardness, annealed
<=140 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3
Cold heading and cold extrusion; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 2 to 100 mm diameter (clause 1.1)
IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5
Not documented
Can IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5?
IS 11169 (Part 1) 15Cr3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 105Cr5 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.