Minimal Match — 53.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 (IS 11169 (Part 1):1984) and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 is typically used for cold heading and cold extrusion; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 2 to 100 mm diameter (clause 1.1), while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is commonly used for case hardening steel (section four).
IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is a 80% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 53.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Cold heading and cold extrusion; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 2 to 100 mm diameter (clause 1.1)
BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
IS 11169 (Part 1) 35C8 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.