Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 (IS 1570 (Part 3):1979) and SAE J403 1138 (SAE J403:2001) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Free Machining Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while SAE J403 1138 is defined under SAE International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 vs SAE J403 1138 is a 82.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
SAE J403 1138
Tensile Strength
370-490 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=24%
Not specified
Condition
Hot rolled or normalized bars, billets and forgings (Table 2), ruling sections up to 150 mm
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
Not documented
SAE J403 1138
Chemistry-only grade; product scope as listed in the composition notes
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 specifies Si which is not specified for SAE J403 1138.
Can IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 Be Substituted With SAE J403 1138?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 and SAE J403 1138 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 and SAE J403 1138?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 specifies Si which is not specified for SAE J403 1138.
Can IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 be substituted with SAE J403 1138?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 and SAE J403 1138 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.