IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 vs IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
Related Material — 61.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 (IS 1570 (Part 3):1979) and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 (IS 1570 (Part 3):1979) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Free Machining Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 vs IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 is a 84.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 14.7%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 61.4%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14
IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10
Tensile Strength
440-540 MPa
370-490 MPa
Elongation
>=22%
>=24%
Condition
Hot rolled or normalized bars, billets and forgings (Table 2), ruling sections up to 150 mm
Hot rolled or normalized bars, billets and forgings (Table 2), ruling sections up to 150 mm
Can IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 14C14S14 and IS 1570 (Part 3) 10C8S10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.