Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 (IS 1570 (Part 3):1979) and SAE J403 1117 (SAE J403:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Free Machining Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while SAE J403 1117 is defined under SAE International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 vs SAE J403 1117 is a 76.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18
SAE J403 1117
Tensile Strength
550-650 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=17%
Not specified
Condition
Hot rolled or normalized bars, billets and forgings (Table 2), ruling sections up to 150 mm
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18
Not documented
SAE J403 1117
Chemistry-only grade; product scope as listed in the composition notes
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 specifies Si which is not specified for SAE J403 1117.
Can IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 Be Substituted With SAE J403 1117?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 and SAE J403 1117 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 and SAE J403 1117?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 specifies Si which is not specified for SAE J403 1117.
Can IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 be substituted with SAE J403 1117?
IS 1570 (Part 3) 40C10S18 and SAE J403 1117 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.