IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2
Close Alternative — 73.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 is a 73.5% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 73.5%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3
IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2
Tensile Strength
Not specified
>=1340 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
>=9%
Izod Impact
Not specified
>=35 J
Condition
Not specified
Case hardening steel, refined and quenched, core properties
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni6Cr7Mo3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.