Minimal Match — 53.3% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 is a 80% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 53.3%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15
BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10
Tensile Strength
890-1090 MPa
430 MPa min
Yield Strength
>=740 MPa
Not specified
Condition
Sheet and strip, hardened and tempered or cold rolled and tempered
Case hardened, 19 mm test bar
Elongation
Not specified
18 % min
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15
Not documented
BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 47C15 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.