Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and EN 10088-1 1.4401 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 1.4401 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 vs EN 10088-1 1.4401 is a 56.1% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13
EN 10088-1 1.4401
Tensile Strength
Not specified
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
≥210 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
≥40%
Hardness
Not specified
≤215 HB
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13
Not documented
EN 10088-1 1.4401
Marine, chemical processing, pharmaceutical equipment
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 1.4401 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4401?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 and EN 10088-1 1.4401 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 and EN 10088-1 1.4401?
EN 10088-1 1.4401 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4401?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X66Cr13 and EN 10088-1 1.4401 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.