IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 vs IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3
Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 (IS 1570 (Part 6):1996) and IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3 (IS 1570 (Part 6):1996) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 vs IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3 is a 41.8% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 specifies Mo, V, W, Co which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3.
IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3 specifies Cu, Ni which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1.
Can IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3?
IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 and IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 and IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3?
IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 specifies Mo, V, W, Co which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3. IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3 specifies Cu, Ni which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1.
Can IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3?
IS 1570 (Part 6) XT82Mo8Cr4W1V1 and IS 1570 (Part 6) 118T3 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.