Related Material — 64.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 (IS 2062 (Part 1):2025) and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 is typically used for structural work: welded, bolted and riveted structures and general engineering purposes, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing.
IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 vs AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is a 97.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 64.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Structural work: welded, bolted and riveted structures and general engineering purposes
AS/NZS 3679.1 350
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing
Key Differences
IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 specifies CEV which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 350.
Can IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 specifies CEV which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 350.
Can IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
IS 2062 (Part 1) E300B0 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.