Related Material — 64.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 2062 E300 (IS 2062:2006) and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
IS 2062 E300 is typically used for structural work: welded, bolted and riveted structures and general engineering purposes, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing.
IS 2062 E300 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, IS 2062 E300 vs AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is a 96.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 64.4%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
>=50 J at room temperature (25 +/- 2°C) / >=30 J at -20°C
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 2062 E300
Structural work: welded, bolted and riveted structures and general engineering purposes
AS/NZS 3679.1 350
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing
Key Differences
IS 2062 E300 specifies CEV which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 350.
Can IS 2062 E300 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
IS 2062 E300 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 2062 E300 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
IS 2062 E300 specifies CEV which is not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 350.
Can IS 2062 E300 be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
IS 2062 E300 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.