Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 (IS 4367:1991) and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 is typically used for gears, pinion gears, camshafts, transmission parts, aircraft components, heavy duty shafts, while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 66.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
850 MPa min
850-1100 MPa
Elongation
>=12%
Not specified
Izod Impact
48 J min
Not specified
Hardness (soft annealed)
<=229 HB
Not specified
Condition
Refined, quenched and stress relieved (core properties), ruling section up to 60 mm
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 specifies Ni which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 and NF A35-565 100C6?
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 specifies Ni which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
IS 4367 13Ni13Cr3 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.