Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 4367 55Si7 (IS 4367:1991) and EN 10089 50CrV4 (EN 10089:2002) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
IS 4367 55Si7 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10089 50CrV4 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 4367 55Si7 vs EN 10089 50CrV4 is a 68.2% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 4367 55Si7
EN 10089 50CrV4
Tensile Strength
1300-1500 MPa
1100–1300 MPa
Hardness
380-440 HB
321–375 HB
Hardness (soft annealed)
<=245 HB
Not specified
Condition
Hardened and tempered, ruling section up to 100 mm
Not specified
Yield Strength
Not specified
≥1000 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
≥8%
Typical Applications
IS 4367 55Si7
Not documented
EN 10089 50CrV4
Valve springs, high duty coil springs, hand tools
Key Differences
IS 4367 55Si7 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10089 50CrV4.
EN 10089 50CrV4 specifies Cr, V which are not specified for IS 4367 55Si7.
Can IS 4367 55Si7 Be Substituted With EN 10089 50CrV4?
IS 4367 55Si7 and EN 10089 50CrV4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 4367 55Si7 and EN 10089 50CrV4?
IS 4367 55Si7 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10089 50CrV4. EN 10089 50CrV4 specifies Cr, V which are not specified for IS 4367 55Si7.
Can IS 4367 55Si7 be substituted with EN 10089 50CrV4?
IS 4367 55Si7 and EN 10089 50CrV4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.