Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 (IS 4367:1991) and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 vs IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is a 61.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Tensile Strength
700-850 MPa
410-590 MPa
Yield Strength
540 MPa min
245 MPa min
Elongation
>=18%
>=18%
Izod Impact
55 J min
55 J min
Hardness
208-252 HB
Not specified
Hardness (soft annealed)
<=220 HB
<=187 HB
Condition
Hardened and tempered, ruling section up to 150 mm
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 50 mm
Typical Applications
IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3
gears, crankshafts, connecting rods, heavy duty shafts, high strength bolts, forged components
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Not documented
Key Differences
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni which is not specified for IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3.
Can IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 Be Substituted With IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Ni which is not specified for IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3.
Can IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 be substituted with IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
IS 4367 40Cr4Mo3 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.